substack.com
Substack
Capturing screenshot…
Loading substack.com in a browser. This takes a few seconds.
Jev AI rates substack.com leaking visitors with a conversion score of 49/100 and a design score of 61/100. Here's how each part of the page scored.
Conversion score
Leaking visitors
Design score
Average design
Biggest opportunity: social proof
To score higher, aim for this: Some logos or short testimonials, but anonymous or lacking specifics.
Conversion
49/100
Understandable product and benefit, but the audience or outcome needs a second read.
Standard CTA like "Sign up" or "Get started" near the top, with no risk reducer.
Vague claims only, like 'trusted by thousands', with no names or numbers.
Mostly long paragraphs, with occasional headings.
Design
61/100
A distinctive, crafted design system with custom typography and tokens.
A clear palette and type system with a few one-off colors, sizes or shapes.
Multiple or missing h1s, few sections, hard to see what matters.
Many breakpoints with a flex/grid layout.
Icons, transitions, hover and focus states, a social preview image.
- First screen
- Clear way to start
- Intro
- Easy to read
- Headline
- No buzzwords
- Page type
- NewsletterB2C Consumers
Share this score
Post it, or download the image.
Score history
3 versions. Every rescan is saved, so you can see how the page changed.
How does your page compare to substack.com?
Get your free conversion and design score from Jev AI in seconds. No signup.