SaaS · Reviewed October 8, 2026
grammarly.com landing page review
Your page makes starting easy, but it makes visitors work too hard to understand why they should start. Conversion performance is 65/100: the free signup and highly scannable features are strengths, while the vague headline and limited customer evidence weaken the pitch. Keep the polished SaaS experience and focus your changes on clarity and trust, not a redesign.
Capturing screenshot…
Loading grammarly.com in a browser. This takes a few seconds.
Conversion score
Solid, with gaps
Design score
Modern design
The biggest problem
“Think big. We’ll take care of the details.” could describe almost any productivity product. Headline clarity scores 4.7/10, and because the headline carries 35% of the conversion assessment, making the writing benefit explicit is your highest-priority fix.
A rewritten hero section
What the top of the page could say instead.
Your voice. Clearer writing.
Write clearly, fix mistakes, and find the right tone with Grammarly—your AI writing partner across apps and websites. Start free.
Get Grammarly freeWhat to change
Ordered by expected impact on conversions.
- 1High impactHero headline and subheadline
The headline sells a feeling before it explains the product. The supporting sentence adds “AI partner” and “impossible to ignore,” but leaves practical benefits less explicit than they could be.
New visitors have to infer what Grammarly does. Headline clarity is only 4.7/10; this is a bigger conversion weakness than your CTA or page structure.
Now
“Think big. We’ll take care of the details.” / “Work with an AI partner that helps turn your thoughts into writing that’s clear, credible, and impossible to ignore.”
Change to
Headline: “Your voice. Clearer writing.” Subheadline: “Write clearly, fix mistakes, and find the right tone with Grammarly—your AI writing partner across apps and websites. Start free.”
- 2High impactSocial proof
The page contains 16 logo images, but no customer quotes or quantified customer outcomes. Logos alone do not explain what someone gains from using Grammarly.
Social proof scores 5.4/10 and carries 20% of the conversion assessment. Visitors get your promises without a concrete customer experience that backs them up.
Now
“Better writing,better results”
Change to
Immediately below the hero, add one static proof block headed “Better writing. In their words.” Include a permissioned, verbatim customer quote describing a specific improvement to an email, document, or other everyday writing task, followed by their name and relevant role. Keep the existing logo strip, but do not substitute it for the quote or publish placeholder praise.
- 3Medium impactPrimary CTA
“Sign up It’s free” emphasizes creating an account rather than getting writing help. The Google alternative is useful, but the two labels could communicate the choice more cleanly.
CTA friction scores 7.2/10, so this is a refinement rather than a broken conversion path. A benefit-oriented primary label gives visitors a clearer reason to take the account-creation step.
Now
“Sign up It’s free” / “Sign up with Google”
Change to
Use “Get Grammarly free” for the primary button and “Continue with Google” for the alternative. Keep both signup paths and the existing terms and privacy disclosure.
- 4Medium impactFeature order
The feature sequence leads with paragraph rewrites and places proofreading third, while “Humanizer agent” and “AI Detector agent” introduce a second, more specialized use case.
The page already scores 9.8/10 for scannability. The opportunity is not shorter copy; it is putting the most immediately understandable writing benefits first so visitors recognize their own needs.
Now
“Paragraph rewritesImprove clarity and flow with one click.” / “Tone suggestionsAdapt your message for the context.” / “ProofreadingRefine grammar, structure, clarity, and more.” / “Humanizer agentGive your writing personality.” / “AI Detector agentSpot AI-generated text and areas to revise.”
Change to
Order the first three feature cards as: “Proofreading — Catch mistakes and improve clarity.” “Tone suggestions — Find the right tone for your message.” “Paragraph rewrites — Improve clarity and flow with one click.” Place Humanizer agent and AI Detector agent afterward under “More ways to refine your writing.” Preserve plan-specific availability labels.
- 5Medium impactPlan comparison
The plan lineup names Free, Pro, and Enterprise, but the Enterprise benefits refer to Plus.
An unexplained plan name makes visitors question what Enterprise includes and whether the comparison is current. That uncertainty is unnecessary at the point where they are deciding what to buy.
Now
“Everything in Plus, and more”
Change to
Remove the reference to Plus. If Enterprise includes every Pro feature, use “Everything in Pro, and more.” If it does not, replace the inherited-plan statement with an explicit list of included features verified against the current Enterprise offering.
- 6Low impactHero CTA hierarchy
The opening area offers free signup paths alongside “Request a demo,” introducing a sales-led choice into a primarily consumer signup journey.
Most individual visitors should be able to choose the free route without evaluating an enterprise sales path. Your CTA is already present and usable; the goal is to reduce competing emphasis, not remove useful navigation.
Now
“Sign up It’s free” / “Sign up with Google” / “Request a demo”
Change to
Make “Get Grammarly free” the only high-emphasis hero action, with “Continue with Google” as its signup alternative. Keep “Request a demo” as a lower-emphasis navigation link and within the Enterprise section rather than a peer to the hero signup buttons.
Quick wins
Small changes you can ship today.
- Replace the hero headline with “Your voice. Clearer writing.” and paste in the rewritten subheadline.
- Rename the primary signup button “Get Grammarly free” and the Google option “Continue with Google.”
- Verify Enterprise inheritance and remove the outdated “Everything in Plus, and more” line.
- Reorder the existing feature cards so Proofreading, Tone suggestions, and Paragraph rewrites come first.
- Reduce the emphasis of “Request a demo” wherever it competes directly with the hero’s free signup actions.
Design fixes
How to make the page look sharper and easier to follow.
- Do not rebuild the page: modernity and polish both score 9.8/10, and visual hierarchy scores 8.6/10. Preserve the responsive grid/flex layouts and existing hover and keyboard-focus states while changing the hero message and CTA emphasis.
- Consistency is the weaker design area at 6.3/10. Audit the five main font entries, 61 font sizes, and 79 border-radius values; consolidate the hero, feature cards, pricing cards, and buttons onto a small, shared set of type and component styles. Those counts suggest an audit opportunity, not proof that every variation is visible.
- Responsiveness scores 7.7/10 despite extensive responsive styling. Check the rewritten hero and pricing comparison at 320, 375, and 768 pixels: keep signup labels unbroken, stack signup choices when needed, and ensure each price remains attached to its plan name and billing details.
Keep doing this
What's already working. Don't change it.
- You offer a free signup and a Google signup option immediately. Keep that direct account-creation path rather than adding an unnecessary intermediate step.
- The short feature descriptions and compact plan benefits make the page easy to scan, reflected in the 9.8/10 scannability score. You do not need more paragraphs.
- “Keep your voice, make it clear” is a strong, specific promise. Preserve that idea and elevate it into the opening message.
Full Jev AI scorecard
Biggest opportunity: headline clarity
To score higher, aim for this: Clear product, audience, and benefit, with minor wordiness or abstraction.
Conversion
65/100
Understandable product and benefit, but the audience or outcome needs a second read.
Specific, action-oriented CTA in the first section with some risk reducer or a clear next step.
Some logos or short testimonials, but anonymous or lacking specifics.
Concise benefit-led subheadings, bullet points, and digestible feature blocks throughout.
Design
82/100
A distinctive, crafted design system with custom typography and tokens.
A clear palette and type system with a few one-off colors, sizes or shapes.
One clear h1, logical sections with h2s, supporting visuals.
Many breakpoints with a flex/grid layout.
Micro-interactions, dark mode, optimized imagery and accessible focus states.
- First screen
- Clear way to start
- Intro
- Easy to read
- Headline
- No buzzwords
- Page type
- SaaSB2C Consumers
Get a review like this for your landing page
Get your free conversion and design score from Jev AI in seconds. No signup.
Rebuild your landing page with DaisyLanding
Get a high-converting, professional daisyUI landing page in minutes. No code, no designer.
- High-converting
- Modern daisyUI
- Live in minutes
More SaaS reviews
All reviewsCapturing screenshot…
beehiiv.com
SaaS
“NEWSLETTERS.PODCASTS.COMMUNITY.ONE PLATFORM.” sells your product categories rather than the customer’s outcome. In the most valuable space on the page, a creator or small publisher should immediately see how beehiiv helps them build an audience and earn—not just consolidate tools.
Capturing screenshot…
cal.com
SaaS
“The better way to schedule your meetings” names the category but gives visitors no concrete reason to choose you. The subheadline then spreads attention across individuals, businesses, and developers instead of making the everyday scheduling benefit obvious.
Capturing screenshot…
ahrefs.com
SaaS
“Make your business discoverable—in search, AI, and beyond” describes an ambition, not a clear buying reason. “And beyond” makes an already broad platform sound even broader, leaving visitors to work out what Ahrefs will actually help them do.